Tags
Bewildered by the balderdash, Collapse of meaning, Correct Speech?, John McWhorter, Social Justice Factories?, Troubling trends of the intellect, When you're not woke enough, Woke Enough?, Woke Racism, Wokeness vs Wokeism, Words and phrases you may want to think twice about using, You can never be woke enough
John Ivison provides a provocative interview on “Woke language champions are tone-deaf” (first 6 minutes of the interview above). It is in response to “Words and Phrases you may want to think twice about using” – an article by the CBC who tend to impose their elitist opinions on ordinary Canadians who unfortunately must endure the “privilege” they condescend to offer their audience who are taxed to pay for it unlike any other news agency in the nation.
For more see journalist Tara Henley on why she recently resigned from the CBC after working there since 2013: “Why I resigned from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.”)
Jesse Kline wrote in reaction to the CBC article,
In an age in which many on the left seem to be constantly trying to outdo one another in their endless quest to find racism and offence in even the most mundane aspects of society and language, I often think the world would be a much better place if people simply had the chutzpah to say, “That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
All this is in the theme of “when you’re not woke enough“, as a growing number of thinkers, professors, and even some journalists are beginning to push back. They join the “ordinary” person who, no doubt, is bewildered by the balderdash that is being passed off as correct speech (or as “newspeak” [new speak] coined by George Orwell in his dystopian classic, “1984”). Jonathan Kay illustrates this in “How woke can you go?“:
Words are getting banned so fast, in fact, that some of us don’t even have time to learn the new ones before they’re relegated to history’s racist dustbin. On December 11, Shree Paradkar, the Toronto Star ’s “Race and Gender Columnist,” dedicated a whole column to the revelation that she is “saying bye-bye to ‘BIPOC,’” an acronym that entered common progressive parlance just a few years ago, and which many ordinary Canadians don’t yet use or even understand. Paradkar complained that “as with POC or person of colour, BIPOC got swallowed up, quickly lost nuance, and got spat out as a racial identifier to say ‘not white.’
To listen to an interview with Newsweek opinion editor Batya Ungar-Sargon go to “Bad News: How Woke Media is Undermining Democracy.”
Academics begin to Respond
Colombia University Professor of Linguistics, John McWhorter wrote, “Woke Racism: How a New Religion has Betrayed Black America.” Washington Post book reviewer Elie Mystal criticizes:
“McWhorter’s central thesis is that being woke — by which he seems to mean acknowledging the ongoing fact of bigotry, systemic racism and the resulting forms of oppression — is a religion. Not “like” a religion — McWhorter refuses to hedge this contention with simile. No, McWhorter argues that people who advocate for anti-racism policies, racial sensitivity training and (of course) “critical race theory” are all part of a religious movement with its own clergy. (Ibram X. Kendi, Nikole Hannah-Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates have all been ordained, apparently.) He argues that this religion’s “Elect” has taken over the country and “rule[s] by inflicting terror” on those who dare to speak against it.”
See McWhorter’s PBS interview here:
Troubling Trends of the Intellect
Recently former Canadian Ambassador Derek H. Burney wrote about the troubling trends in Canadian Academia: “The irrational, woke left stifles health care and is ruining higher eduction“:
The ‘scholarship’ now dominated by woke and cancel cultures is producing a new generation of biased and misinformed young people, making them less open to hard truths about history and experience. Instead of teaching students how to think in a fearless pursuit of truth, faculties are more intent on teaching what to think and, more ominously, what to avoid. The warped impact this will have on future leaders of our country is troubling.
To listen to an interview with McGill University scientist Patanjali Kambhampati go to “Professor fighting to stop woke warriors from destroying science.” It is laughably sad that Dr. Kambhampati’s research proposals weren’t considered “diverse” enough for research grants governed by the new thought police.
Or read the critique by Peter Boghossian, assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University who resigned in late 2020. In his resignation letter, he wrote that the university had been changed from “a bastion of free inquiry into a Social Justice factory whose only inputs were race, gender and victimhood and whose only outputs were grievance and division”. (For more see interview on the Rubin Report re: Hoax exposes Social Justice in academia).
Admittedly, I can go on referring to the accumulating evidence that demonstrates something is seriously wrong. Though I am looking for stories to the contrary (as in the rare DeBerry’s post below), I confess it feels like confirmation bias every time I see another story about this troubling trend in academia.
For an opposing view on the larger topic of “wokeness”, read Jarvis DeBerry’s opinion piece, ““Woke” has been weaponized to label those fighting oppression the oppressors“.
When You’re not Woke Enough
The balderdash as correct speech may not be a laughing matter, nevertheless some comedians can find the silliness of serious situations and help us laugh at them – like the infamous Ricky Gervais who said recently:
I want to live long enough to see the younger generation not be woke enough for the next generation. It’s going to happen. Don’t they realise that, it’s like, they’re next. That’s what’s funny.
For more of More Enigma than Dogma, see “In the Absence of Enigma: Dogma.”
Addendum:
On the day I published this post, the story broke about notable Jordan Peterson resigning his full professorship at U of T.
The reason for the resignation is that ‘the appalling ideology of diversity, inclusion is demolishing education and business.
Further, David French later posted this insightful article: Our Nation Cannot Censor Its Way Back to Cultural Health.
It looks like what may have started out as something good has become toxic to both sides of the debate. Oppression, in all of its forms, is very real in our world. It affects us all, regardless of our perceived differences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, we are all affected, and there are real issues of oppression that need to be addressed without being sucked into the vortex of some movement that is just another dishonest worldview. It is ironic that some in the social justice movement (if I can put it like that) are finding themselves “cancelled” by the new thought police. I hope reason and common sense prevail, and though I have been watching this trend for some time – I’m just now finding words to speak to it. As you say: “oppression in all its forms is real”. Thanks for your note.
LikeLike
Thanks for keeping us up to date, Rusty. Crazy crazy pc… governmental and ecclesiastical. Crazy in my part of the world, too. Like the Pharisees of old: I call them ‘the temple police’… they will be with us always, sorry, ‘until Jesus comes again!’ (lol)
Keep me humble yet discerning, O Lord.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am not sure I can keep myself up to date. As I have tried to record, it appears to be a shifting playing field, or no fair play at all. Not sure of the right metaphor. The reality is, there is real oppression and as people of faith – may we be found working for justice without being lost in this supercilious syntactical gymnastics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
While I understand the reasoning behind language changing, it’s important to remember not everyone knows about it, or they might happen to slip up sometimes. Language evolves, but sometimes, I would say it evolves too fast to keep up with. I’m happy to respect people’s pronouns and I’m not going to go around yelling slurs because I know the impact of my actions. It’s more the little things that I find harder to keep track of, and I am forgiving of myself for that
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for your comments. If you’ve read enough of my posts, you will know that I am interested in respectful dialogue, and the kind of conversation that enlightens rather than darkens our understanding of what it means to be a person. I agree with you re: respecting people’s pronouns, and not yelling slurs, or returning insults, or going ad hominem in a discussion. In this day of increasing identity confusion, and language confusion, it takes all we have to be listeners, and to offer a different perspective. In saying all that, I suspect your awareness of “forgiving yourself” may be the most helpful act in the ongoing conversation. Thanks for your comments.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m still new to your blog, but I do get that sense from you that you’re interested in respectful dialogue. I do that too because I get panic attacks when people yell, in general
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a good answer – and it speaks to the idea that when we write on social media – we can be mindful of having a conversation with a person whom we haven’t necessarily met face to face. How different many conversations would be if we first approached topics with “relationship first”, and “ideas second” so to speak. I would be truly interested in anyone giving me insight from a different point of view on the topic that I am summarily calling “balderdash”. As Father Greg Boyle writes, “it becomes impossible to demonize someone you know” (Tattoos on the Heart). Here’s to knowing…
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t know if it’s true anymore that it’s impossible to demonize someone you know. I have lost close friends for not completely agreeing with them one day and other people have told me the same thing. It’s become so problematic in the US in particular and it’s unfortunate. It’s one of the reasons I left
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the tragedy of relationship – and the growing tragedy of our day (though not unique to it). I wonder if things would be different if we entered hard conversations first to understand the other person? In this post there is a link to an interesting conversation on “befriending radical disagreement” that informs and challenges me: https://moreenigma.com/2019/10/30/befriending-radical-disagreement/. That you left the US means how profound was the disagreement – or – how profound was the rift created by the disagreement. May you find some healing and insight for your journey now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing the article. I do feel like I have healed a lot. There just wasn’t any room for me as a Third Culture Kid in the US. I can honestly say we’re among some of the most misunderstood people in the world. That’s why I blog about it
LikeLiked by 1 person